Why You Should Consider Shooting Raw Format for Outdoor Photography

Most digital cameras give you two basic choices for recording your photo files: JPEG or raw (and, sometimes, both). Which to choose? Although JPEG is fine for casual photography, if you really want to take your photography to the next level, consider using raw format for your image files.

I shoot raw format because it allows me to make my photos look their very best. Yasur Volcano, Vanuatu. Canon 5DIV, Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 lens, ISO 400, f/5.6, 15 seconds.

What is a JPEG?

JPEGs are image files created in-camera from the raw image data provided by the sensor. The JPEG file is created using the contrast, saturation, sharpness, and color settings of your camera; any raw image data that does not conform to your camera settings are thrown away and are lost forever. Furthermore, a JPEG file compresses the remaining data, reducing overall file size. As a result, the JPEG file that emerges from your camera is a complete product compressed to a manageable size, ready to use for just about anything.

Shooting JPEG makes things really easy, as you don’t need to do anything with the photos after you trigger the shutter—you just need to make sure that you get your cameras settings right before taking the picture. JPEG format is therefore ideal for casual photography, or certain time-sensitive situations requiring lots and lots of photos (like news photography).

What is raw?

“Raw” isn’t an acronym for anything, but simply refers to the raw data captured by the sensor. This is the original, uncompressed data from the sensor without any manipulation from the camera. Technically, all cameras shoot raw, but when outputting your files as JPEGs, the camera is compressing that information and throwing out data. With raw files, all of the original data is retained. As I discuss below, this gives you more flexibility when editing image files, and to correct for mistakes made when shooting photos.

Raw format maximizes the data in your photo files, allowing you to better capture scenes with a lot of contrast between light and dark. Gullfoss, Iceland. Canon 5DIII, Canon 16-35mm f/4 lens, ISO 100, f/14, 0.3 seconds.

Raw files need to be processed using a computer program

If you shoot JPEG, you never need to do any digital darkroom work, but if you shoot raw, you need to process the raw file on the computer. There are many digital darkroom programs that allow you to easily edit your raw images, with Adobe Lightroom being the most popular. Of course, this means you’ll be doing some extra work to prepare your image files. Because they are larger, raw files take up more computer space than JPEG files.

Why shoot raw?

Okay, so JPEG format compresses and throws out data collected by your sensor, while raw format preserves all of that original data. So what? Most JPEG compression is actually quite good, and you probably won’t notice any loss of quality just because you shoot JPEG format. If you were to do nothing more than just output your JPEG and raw files onto your computer and compare them side-by-side, you probably wouldn’t notice any real difference in image quality (although the JPEG will probably look nicer if the raw file hasn’t been processed, because of the preset processing done by the camera on the JPEG image).

If you want to make any adjustments to your image files on the computer, however, that’s when you’ll really start to notice differences in image quality between the two formats. Think of it this way: because JPEG files have thrown out some of the original data, you end up with small “gaps” that might not be immediately apparent. When you start making adjustments to exposure, color balance, contrast, and saturation with a JPEG file, these gaps grow larger and become much more noticeable. With raw files, those data gaps don’t exist, giving you more leeway to make adjustments without noticeable loss of image quality. This means you have more license for artistic interpretation, and for getting the image to appear the way you want it to look.

Edited raw files retain higher quality than edited JPEGs. Torres del Paine National Park, Chile. Canon 5DII, Canon 24-105mm f/4 lens, ISO 200, f/11, 0.6 seconds.

Here are a few of the chief advantages of shooting in raw format:

Raw preserves your original data

Every time you edit and save a JPEG file, you’ve made permanent changes to the file and thrown out some data. Although you might not notice any reduction of image quality with minor edits, with more substantial edits or multiple editing sessions, you’ll start to notice a significant loss of image quality.

But with raw files, you never lose data, no matter how much editing you do. That’s because you are never editing the raw data itself; instead, when you “change” the raw file, you’re actually just creating a set of instructions for how the image should look. You can always undo all of the changes you have made or reset your adjustments without any loss of image quality. This means that you never need to worry about ruining your photos because of bad editing decisions.

Shooting raw gives me maximum flexibility when editing my images on the computer. Sumatra, Indonesia. Canon 1DXII, Canon 8-15mm f/4 fisheye lens, flash, ISO 400, f/9, 1/40 second.

Raw allows you to make penalty-free white balance adjustments

The white balance setting on your camera basically determines the color balance of your photos. When you shoot JPEG, your camera applies this white balance setting to the JPEG image. Although you can change the white balance of the photo later on the computer, because your camera has already thrown away some raw data, this white balance change will reduce overall image quality. But with raw files, you can make “penalty-free” white balance adjustments on the computer without any loss of image quality. So, shooting raw means you don’t have to waste time in the field trying to figure out the best white balance for each of your photos. Instead, you can do it later on the computer at your leisure, and you can precisely fine-tune your white balance to the exact setting you desire.

You can freely change the color balance of your raw files without any loss of image quality. Kolmanskop, Namibia. Canon 5DIII, Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 lens, ISO 100, f/11, 1 second.

Raw format allows you to capture more highlight and shadow detail at the same time

Without getting too technical, a raw file is able to record a wider range of brightness levels than a JPEG file. This means you can simultaneously capture more detail between bright and dark in your photos, and the transition between each brightness level will be smoother, giving you more leeway to alter exposure and contrast than with JPEG files. That means you’re less likely to see posterization or banding—basically, unnatural and abrupt transitions between tones, which you’ll mostly notice in the skies of your photos—when shooting and editing raw files. Also, you can recover, to some extent, overexposed highlight data from a raw file, which you can’t do with JPEG. Overall, raw gives you more data to work with, and smoother transitions between tones and brightness levels, giving your final edited photos a cleaner, more natural look.


When shooting JPEG, your camera is making creative choices about saturation, contrast, and color balance for you. When you shoot raw, you get to make these important decisions yourself, putting you fully in control over how the final image should look. This allows you to fully utilize the potential of the digital darkroom to correct mistakes made when taking photos, and you can enhance and optimize your photos to ensure that they always look their very best.


About the author: Whether hanging over the rim of an active volcano, braving the elements to photograph critically-endangered species, or trekking deep into the wilderness to places most people will never see, world-renowned professional photographer Ian Plant travels the globe seeking out amazing places and subjects in his never-ending quest to capture the beauty of our world with his camera. Ian is a frequent contributor to many leading photo magazines, Managing Editor of Outdoor Photography Guide, a Tamron Image Master, and the author of numerous books and instructional videos. Known for his inspiring images and single-minded dedication to creating the perfect photo, Ian has reached hundreds of thousands of people around the world in his mission to inspire and educate others in the art of photography. You can see more of his work at www.ianplant.com.

Have something to add to the story? Leave a comment or email editor@outdoorphotographyguide.com.

Share tips, start a discussion or ask one of our experts or other students a question.

Make a comment:
characters remaining

7 Responses to “Why You Should Consider Shooting Raw Format for Outdoor Photography”

  1. Alexandra De Vylder

    Thank you! Your beautiful photos are such a joy to see. The blue in that boat :o

  2. Majahnke

    <strong> 18343 Ticket I would like to start shooting in RAW. I have a Mac Book Pro, and the only editing I have every used is with Photo. What should be my next step to get the most of photo editing, without spending 2 hours to edit one photo?

  3. jasminekahly.photo

    <strong> Ticket 18137 When I shoot Raw, it does not allow me to transfer it to my phone. Any idea how I can fix that?

  4. Richard Frehs

    Great explanation between JPEG and raw. Thanks!

  5. Dan K

    A photograph of two orangutans in this article is said to be in Kolmanskop, Namibia. 1. Orangutans only live in Indonesia. 2. Kolmanskop is a desert. Clearly, the caption is incorrect.

  6. Dave R. Williams

    Love to see your way of doing things!!

  7. Kenny Hall

    My shooting mode in my camera is set at raw. Do I need to specify in Lightroom that I want to edit in raw? I noticed that when I edit, the details of the photo indicates JPEG.